Minnesota Supreme Court, 2004

Dimon v. METZ BAKING

Dimon v. METZ BAKING
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 29, 2004 · Meyer
674 N.W.2d 190; 2004 Minn. LEXIS 51; 2004 WL 226280 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John H. Guthmann, Kathleen M. Daly, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, PLLP, St. Paul, MN, for relators., David C. Wulff, Roseville, MN, for respondent.

Dimon v. METZ BAKING

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*191 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 7, 2003, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. CivApp. P. 136.01.

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen Meyer, Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.