Minnesota Supreme Court, 2004

In re Disciplinary Action Against Flynn

In re Disciplinary Action Against Flynn
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 12, 2004 · Paul
679 N.W.2d 330; 2004 Minn. LEXIS 266; 2004 WL 1118738 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision

Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

In re Disciplinary Action Against Flynn

Minnesota statutes cited

Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent William C. Flynn committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, respondent was convicted of illegally possessing pornographic work involving minors in violation of Minn. Stat. § 617.247, subd. 4(a) (2002). Respondent’s criminal conviction violates Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b).

Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a five-year suspension from the practice of law with reinstatement conditioned upon (1) payment of $900 in costs under Rule 24, RLPR; (2) compliance with Rule 26, RLPR; (3) successful completion of the professional responsibility bar examination; (4) satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements; and (5) successful completion of criminal probation.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent William C. Flynn is suspended from the practice of law for five years effective immediately, with reinstatement subject to the agreed-upon conditions set forth above. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs under Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.