Minnesota Supreme Court, 2004

GANFIELD v. City of Richfield

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided September 29, 2004 · Alan

687 N.W.2d 180; 2004 Minn. LEXIS 613; 2004 WL 2251776 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James E. Lindell, Lindell & Lavoie, L.L.P., Minneapolis, for relator., Leslie M. Altman, David M. Bateson, Rider Bennett, L.L.P., Minneapolis, for respondent City of Richfield., Thomas M. Peterson, St. Paul, for respondent City of Apple Valley.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2004, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Lett (Minn. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 24, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT

/a/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.