In re Disciplinary Action Against Friday
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2011, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Friday (Minn. 2011)
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Waite (Minn. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Robert Carl Friday committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, failing to diligently pursue a representation on behalf of a client, failing to adequately communicate with the client, and misrepresenting to the court, opposing counsel, and his client the work he did on the file; failing to diligently pursue a second client matter, misrepresenting the status of the representation to his client, and billing the client for services he had not performed; practicing law while fee-suspended; failing to timely file state and federal income tax returns; and failing to cooperate with the Director’s investigation in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 3.2, 3.3, 5.5(a), 8.1(a), and 8.4(b) and (d).
Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension for a minimum of six months; payment of $900 in costs and $23 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR; compliance with Rule 26, RLPR; successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the bar examination under Rule 18(e), RLPR; satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements under Rule 18(e), RLPR; and filing of all outstanding federal and state individual income tax returns.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Robert Carl Friday is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law effective 14 days from the date of this order and that he is not eligible to petition for reinstatement for a minimum of six months. Reinstatement is conditioned on the agreed-upon conditions set forth above. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and $23 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.