In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Lieber
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2013, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Lieber (Minn. 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action and a second amended and supplementary petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Daniel Martin Lieber has committed profession misconduct warranting public discipline. The referee conducted a hearing and filed his findings of fact, conclusion of law, and recommendation for discipline recommending that respondent be disbarred.
The referee found that respondent made improper financial advances to clients, charged the clients interest on the sums advanced at the rate of 15 percent per month, failed to disclose his conflict of interest in the transactions, lied about his involvement in the transactions both before and during the disciplinary investigation, made false statements under oath regarding his involvement in the transactions, ratified the false sworn testimony of one of his employees about one of the transactions, mishandled client funds held in his trust account by regularly making disbursements, primarily to clients, before depositing client funds to the accounts in support of those disbursements resulting in the temporary misappropriation of other clients’ funds to cover those disbursements, commingled personal and client funds in the trust account, failed to maintain proper books and records regarding funds held in trust, and falsely certified that he maintained the required trust ac-
count books and records, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7, 1.8(a), (e), and Cj), 1.15(a), (b), (c), and (h), 3.4(b), 4.1, 8.1(a)(3), and 8.4(a), (c), and (d).
Respondent has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they stipulate that the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are conclusive and they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is immediate disbarment and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Daniel Martin Lieber is disbarred, effective immediately. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.