Minnesota Supreme Court, 2005

Schulenburg v. Corn Plus

Schulenburg v. Corn Plus
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 25, 2005
696 N.W.2d 790; 2005 Minn. LEXIS 317; 2005 WL 1303328 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Schulenburg v. Corn Plus

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 8, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary disposi *791 tions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). We conclude that the treatment parameters provided in Minn. R. 5221.6020, subp. 2, do not apply to treatment provided while the employer is contesting liability, including all appeals. But our affirmance of the compensation judge’s order that the employer pay for IDET procedures is limited to such procedures provided prior to the date of this order. Our order does not preclude the employer from objecting to IDET procedures provided after the date of this order.

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.