King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

Minnesota Supreme Court March 29, 2005

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc., 693 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. 2005)

2005 Minn. LEXIS 158; 2005 WL 729499

Blatz

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Robert G. KING, Relator v. WOODSMAN MIDWEST, INC., and Auto-Owners Insurance Group, and Kenwood Chiropractic Arts, Intervenor
Status: Published