Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 2005

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 29, 2005 · Blatz
693 N.W.2d 876; 2005 Minn. LEXIS 158; 2005 WL 729499 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert E. King, pro se appellant., Karen Ruth Swanton, Fitch, Johnson, Larson, Walsh, and Held, Minneapolis, for Auto-Owners Ins. Co., respondent.

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.