Alarcon v. Coca-Cola Enterprises

Minnesota Supreme Court July 19, 2005

Alarcon v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, 699 N.W.2d 757 (Minn. 2005)

2005 Minn. LEXIS 422; 2005 WL 1774307

Anderson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 23, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no *758precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Humberto ALARCON, Relator v. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, Self-Insured, adm'd by National Loss Control Services, and Capitol Orthopedics, Ingenix/UCare Minnesota, and Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Intervenors
Status: Published