In re Disciplinary Action Against Haefele
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
In re Disciplinary Action Against Haefele
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Following a hearing on a petition for disciplinary action filed against Richard J. Haefele, the referee found that respondent committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, engaging in a consensual sexual relationship with a client and entering into a series of business transactions with the same client without written disclosure of the potential conflicts and without providing for fair and reasonable terms for his client in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.8(k) and 1.8(a). The referee recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months.
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent have entered into a stipulation in which they agree that the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are conclusive, respondent waives briefing and oral argument to the Supreme Court, and the parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a six-month suspension conditioned upon payment of $900 in costs and disbursements under Rule 24, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and compliance with Rule 26, RLPR.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Richard J. HAEFELE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 39214
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published