In re Disciplinary Action Against Haefele
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2007, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Reinstatement of Haefele (Minn. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Following a hearing on a petition for disciplinary action filed against Richard J. Haefele, the referee found that respondent committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, engaging in a consensual sexual relationship with a client and entering into a series of business transactions with the same client without written disclosure of the potential conflicts and without providing for fair and reasonable terms for his client in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.8(k) and 1.8(a). The referee recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months.
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent have entered into a stipulation in which they agree that the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are conclusive, respondent waives briefing and oral argument to the Supreme Court, and the parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a six-month suspension conditioned upon payment of $900 in costs and disbursements under Rule 24, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and compliance with Rule 26, RLPR.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.