Minnesota Supreme Court, 2006

Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group

Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 17, 2006
708 N.W.2d 496; 2006 Minn. LEXIS 16; 2006 WL 133978 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2006, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation

Court of Appeals filed September 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.