Skelley v. Lucent Technologies
Minnesota Supreme Court
Skelley v. Lucent Technologies, 722 N.W.2d 927 (Minn. 2006)
2006 Minn. LEXIS 770; 2006 WL 3095551
Russell
Skelley v. Lucent Technologies
Opinion
*928 ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 27, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas SKELLEY, Respondent, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, and Reliance National Insurance Company/Heritage Claim Service, Relators
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published