Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 2006

Turner v. EVTAC Mining

Turner v. EVTAC Mining
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 22, 2006 · Anderson
724 N.W.2d 14; 2006 Minn. LEXIS 845; 2006 WL 3438547 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Diana L. Brennan, Brennan Law Office, Inver Grove Hts., MN, for Relator., Thomas F. Coleman, Cousineau McGuire Chartered, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents.

Turner v. EVTAC Mining

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Associate Justice.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 25, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.