Victor v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS

Minnesota Supreme Court March 28, 2007

Victor v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS, 729 N.W.2d 576 (Minn. 2007)

2007 Minn. LEXIS 172; 2007 WL 1018366

Alan C. Page

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 21, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Victor VICTOR, Respondent, v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Relators, and Grand Itasca Hospital, MN Department of Labor & Industry/Vocational Rehab Unit, Grand Itasca Clinic, and CIGNA Healthcare/Primax Recoveries Incorporated, Intervenors
Status: Published