Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE
Minnesota Supreme Court
Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE, 733 N.W.2d 776 (Minn. 2007)
2007 Minn. LEXIS 391; 2007 WL 1845538
A
Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE
Opinion
AMENDED ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 26, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Shirley BARTZ, Relator, v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE, and Constitution State Services, Respondents
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published