Minnesota Supreme Court, 2007

Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 25, 2007 · A

733 N.W.2d 776; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 391; 2007 WL 1845538 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 26, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.