Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.

Minnesota Supreme Court September 26, 2007

Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC., 739 N.W.2d 159 (Minn. 2007)

2007 Minn. LEXIS 614; 2007 WL 2874943

Opinion

*160 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 24, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Mark D. SCHMITT, Respondent, v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent, and American Interstate Insurance Co., Respondent, and West Bend Mutual Insurance Co., Relator, and MN Dept. of Labor & Industry, Voc. Rehab. Unit, MN Dept. of Human Services, St. Paul Radiology, Regions Hospital, Intervenors, and Special Compensation Fund
Status: Published