Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 2007

Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.

Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided September 26, 2007
739 N.W.2d 159; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 614; 2007 WL 2874943 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Matthew P. Bandt, Jardine, Logan & O’Brien, PLLP, Lake Elmo, MN, for relator West Bend Mutual Insurance Co., John H. Guthmann, Trisha A. Vicario, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, PLLP, St. Paul, MN, for respondent Innovative Lawn Systems., Jay T. Hartman, Tracy M. Borash, Hea-cox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff & Johnson, PA, St. Paul, MN, for respondent American Interstate Ins. Co., Thaddeus V. Jude, St. Paul, MN, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for Special Compensation Fund.

Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.

Opinion

*160 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 24, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.