RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering
Minnesota Supreme Court
RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering, 740 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2007)
2007 Minn. LEXIS 670; 2007 WL 3292101
Russell A. Anderson
RECHTFERTIG v. Spiering
Opinion
*775 ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 19, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joshua RECHTFERTIG, Relator, v. Michael SPIERING, Uninsured, Respondent, and St. Mary’s Duluth Clinic Health System, and JC Christensen/Radiological Associates, Intervenors, and Special Compensation Fund, Respondent
- Status
- Published