Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 2007

Bense v. ALLIANCE SAVINGS CO.

Bense v. ALLIANCE SAVINGS CO.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 31, 2007
740 N.W.2d 569; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 671; 2007 WL 3292099 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Megan Elizabeth Burkhammer, St. Cloud, MN, for Respondent., Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for Special Compensation Fund., Cheryl A. Hood Langel, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet & Miller, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Relator.

Bense v. ALLIANCE SAVINGS CO.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 6, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [sjummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.