Haeg v. Seko Worldwide
Minnesota Supreme Court
Haeg v. Seko Worldwide, 732 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 2007)
2007 Minn. LEXIS 313; 2007 WL 1632166
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Haeg v. Seko Worldwide
Opinion
*201 ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 4, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tamara Joan HAEG, Respondent, v. SEKO WORLDWIDE D/B/A Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, Adm’d by Berkley Risk Administrators, Respondent, and Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, North Memorial Ambulance Service, and Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Intervenors
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published