Minnesota Supreme Court, 2007

Haeg v. Seko Worldwide

Haeg v. Seko Worldwide
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 30, 2007
732 N.W.2d 200; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 313; 2007 WL 1632166 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Gary L. Meyer, Meyer, Puklich, Merriam & Johnson, Eden Prairie, MN, for Respondent., Kris A. Wittwer, Stewart, Zlimen & Jungers, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Relator/Respondent., Roderick C. Cosgriff, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff, & Johnson, P.A., Saint Paul, MN, for Intervenors.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2019, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Haeg v. Seko Worldwide

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*201 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 4, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.