Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp., 752 N.W.2d 518 (Minn. 2008)
2008 Minn. LEXIS 356; 2008 WL 2852421
Helen
Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 8, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Trudy L. ADAMS, Relator, v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION, Self-Insured, Respondent, and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, Mayo Foundation, and Hormel Foods Corporation, Intervenors
- Status
- Published