Lagergren v. Centerpoint energy/minnegasco
Minnesota Supreme Court
Lagergren v. Centerpoint energy/minnegasco, 757 N.W.2d 181 (Minn. 2008)
2008 Minn. LEXIS 619; 2008 WL 4810804
Lagergren v. Centerpoint energy/minnegasco
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 15, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Daniel C. LAGERGREN, Relator, v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO, and Travelers/Constitution State Services Company, Respondents, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Center for Pain Management, St. Cloud Neurobehavioral Associates, NW Industrial Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, and Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Intervenors
- Status
- Published