Anderson v. XCEL ENERGY
Minnesota Supreme Court
Anderson v. XCEL ENERGY, 744 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 2008)
2008 Minn. LEXIS 41; 2008 WL 324826
Russell
Anderson v. XCEL ENERGY
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 15, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d *237 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- David A. ANDERSON, Respondent v. XCEL ENERGY, Self-Insured/G.E. Young & Company, and Ace USA/G.E. Young & Company, Relators, and Fairview Red Wing Health Services, BlueCross BlueShield of MN, University of MN Physicians, and Red Wing Corner Drug, Intervenors
- Status
- Published