Minnesota Supreme Court, 2009

Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA

Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 5, 2009
764 N.W.2d 816; 2009 Minn. LEXIS 281; 2009 WL 1339869 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 13, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.