Marshall v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC.

Minnesota Supreme Court January 28, 2009

Marshall v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., 759 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. 2009)

2009 Minn. LEXIS 26; 2009 WL 261497

Eric J. Magnuson

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers’ Compensation Division, Respondent
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published