NORGREN v. Aramark
Minnesota Supreme Court
NORGREN v. Aramark, 759 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. 2009)
2009 Minn. LEXIS 28; 2009 WL 261499
Alan C. Page
NORGREN v. Aramark
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 24, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dawn NORGREN, Relator, v. ARAMARK, and Lumbermen’s Mutual/Specialty Risk Services, Inc., Respondents
- Status
- Published