Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 2009

NORGREN v. Aramark

NORGREN v. Aramark
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 28, 2009 · Alan C. Page
759 N.W.2d 892; 2009 Minn. LEXIS 28; 2009 WL 261499 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Candice E. Hektner, Peterson & Hek-tner, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for relator., Wbitney L. Teel, James R. Waldhauser, Cousineau McGuire Chartered, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

NORGREN v. Aramark

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 24, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.