Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL

Minnesota Supreme Court March 31, 2009

Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL, 763 N.W.2d 639 (Minn. 2009)

2009 Minn. LEXIS 76; 2009 WL 1012234

Anderson

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 17, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Elvira O. RAMIREZ, Respondent, v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL, and ACE Insurance Company Administered by Prank Gates Services Company, Relators, and Regina Medical Center, Allina, Summit Orthopedics, Walgreen Company, St. Paul Radiology, Therapy Partners, Inc., Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Primary Behavior Health Clinic, Intervenors
Status: Published