Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL
Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL
763 N.W.2d 639; 2009 Minn. LEXIS 76; 2009 WL 1012234
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 17, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.