Minnesota Supreme Court, 2009

Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 31, 2009 · Anderson

763 N.W.2d 639; 2009 Minn. LEXIS 76; 2009 WL 1012234 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jackson S. Baehman, Woodbury, MN, for respondent., Edward Q. Cassidy, Krista A.P. Hatch-er, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relators.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 17, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.