Moe v. University of Minnesota

Minnesota Supreme Court October 5, 2009

Moe v. University of Minnesota, 773 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. 2009)

2009 Minn. LEXIS 632; 2009 WL 3210603

Meyer, Gildea

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 27, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [sjummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice PAGE and GILDEA, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name: Janet L. MOE, Respondent, v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, Self-Insured/Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Relators, and University of Minnesota Physicians, Fairview Health Services, Inc., Intervenors
Status: Published