Konczal v. Hage Construction Company
Minnesota Supreme Court
Konczal v. Hage Construction Company, 776 N.W.2d 171 (Minn. 2010)
2010 Minn. LEXIS 1; 2010 WL 27212
Konczal v. Hage Construction Company
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Andrew KONCZAL, Employee, v. HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and General Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents (A09-1594), Relators (A09-1595), and Fairview Health Services, Relator (A09-1594), Respondent (A09-1595)
- Status
- Published