Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES

Minnesota Supreme Court January 4, 2010

Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES, 776 N.W.2d 171 (Minn. 2010)

2010 Minn. LEXIS 2; 2010 WL 27213

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 *172 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Anna M. GEE, Employee, v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES, and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and HealthEast Care Systems, Relator
Status: Published