Minnesota Supreme Court, 2010

Tambornino v. Health Risk Management

Tambornino v. Health Risk Management
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided August 25, 2010 · Stras
787 N.W.2d 540; 2010 Minn. LEXIS 531; 2010 WL 3431872 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Tambornino v. Health Risk Management

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 18, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) “(explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Dissenting Opinion

*541STRAS, J.

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the summary affirmance in this case because I would have preferred to schedule the case for oral argument given the submissions of the parties.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.