Tambornino v. Health Risk Management
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Tambornino v. Health Risk Management
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 18, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) “(explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent from the summary affirmance in this case because I would have preferred to schedule the case for oral argument given the submissions of the parties.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Shannon M. TAMBORNINO, Respondent, v. HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT, and Kemper Insurance Companies/Broadspire Services, Relators
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published