Tambornino v. Health Risk Management

Minnesota Supreme Court
Tambornino v. Health Risk Management, 787 N.W.2d 540 (Minn. 2010)
2010 Minn. LEXIS 531; 2010 WL 3431872
Stras

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Tambornino v. Health Risk Management

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 18, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) “(explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Dissenting Opinion

*541STRAS, J.

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the summary affirmance in this case because I would have preferred to schedule the case for oral argument given the submissions of the parties.

Reference

Full Case Name
Shannon M. TAMBORNINO, Respondent, v. HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT, and Kemper Insurance Companies/Broadspire Services, Relators
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published