Love v. Allina Health System
Minnesota Supreme Court
Love v. Allina Health System, 792 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 2010)
2010 Minn. LEXIS 805; 2010 WL 5491034
Dietzen
Love v. Allina Health System
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 1, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charlotte A. LOVE, Relator v. ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM, Self-insured/Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., and Life Insurance Company of North America, Health Partners, Allina Health System, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minnesota Department of Human Services, and Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Intervenors
- Status
- Published