In re Disciplinary Action Against Blashack
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2017, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Siders (Minn. 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon respondent Jason Leo Blashack’s guilty plea to and conviction of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, commission of a criminal act reflecting adversely on respondent’s fitness as a lawyer in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b).
Respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and admits the allegations of the disciplinary petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension from the practice of law with no right to petition for reinstatement for a minimum of three years.
The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Jason Leo Blashack is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of filing of this order, for a minimum of three years. Reinstatement is conditioned upon satisfaction of the requirements of Rule 18(a)-(e), RLPR. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 26, RLPR.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.