Minnesota Supreme Court, 2011

Stately v. Red Lake Builders

Stately v. Red Lake Builders
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 1, 2011 · Stras
794 N.W.2d 640; 2011 Minn. LEXIS 67; 2011 WL 810360 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Stately v. Red Lake Builders

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.