Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.

Minnesota Supreme Court May 25, 2011

Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc., 797 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2011)

2011 Minn. LEXIS 278; 2011 WL 2139908

Gildea

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Michael J. BURLINGAME v. BECKER BROTHERS, INC., and Builders & Contractors SIG Fund/MIG and Meadowbrook Insurance Group-BCWCF, Relators
Status: Published