Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.
Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.
797 N.W.2d 723; 2011 Minn. LEXIS 278; 2011 WL 2139908
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.