Miller v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center
Minnesota Supreme Court
Miller v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center, 799 N.W.2d 19 (Minn. 2011)
2011 Minn. LEXIS 382; 2011 WL 2623524
Alan
Miller v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mary Ann MILLER v. ST. MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, n/k/a St. Mary's Innovis Health, Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, L.L.C., Relator, and Meritcare Health System, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Progressive Preferred, and Madison National Life Insurance Company, Intervenors
- Status
- Published