Hansen v. Dayton's

Minnesota Supreme Court August 26, 2011

Hansen v. Dayton's, 802 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 2011)

2011 Minn. LEXIS 549; 2011 WL 3904106

Anderson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. DAYTON'S, n/k/a Macy's, Self-Insured, Relator/Cross-Respondent, and John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, and Medica Health Plans, Intervenor-Respondent
Status: Published