Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp., 805 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 2011)
2011 Minn. LEXIS 688; 2011 WL 5282719
Consideration, Gildea, Meyer, Took
Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 18, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mark TROMPETER, Relator v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Self-Insured/Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
- Status
- Published