Minnesota Supreme Court, 2011

Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services

Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 26, 2011 · Alan, Consideration, Meyer, Took
805 N.W.2d 239; 2011 Minn. LEXIS 690; 2011 WL 5282772 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Johnson v. Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 19, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

MEYER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

*240BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.