Bauer v. Fedex Freight East

Minnesota Supreme Court
Bauer v. Fedex Freight East, 813 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 2012)
2012 WL 1549997; 2012 Minn. LEXIS 169
Gildea

Bauer v. Fedex Freight East

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 12, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of relator for oral argument be, and the same is, denied as moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Reference

Full Case Name
Nicole E. BAUER v. FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, Self-Insured/Xchanging, Relator
Status
Published