Bauer v. Fedex Freight East
Minnesota Supreme Court
Bauer v. Fedex Freight East, 813 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 2012)
2012 WL 1549997; 2012 Minn. LEXIS 169
Gildea
Bauer v. Fedex Freight East
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 12, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of relator for oral argument be, and the same is, denied as moot.
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Nicole E. BAUER v. FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, Self-Insured/Xchanging, Relator
- Status
- Published