Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc., 823 N.W.2d 626 (Minn. 2012)
2012 Minn. LEXIS 687; 2012 WL 6694073
Alan
Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed on June 4, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that ([s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,) doing no more than establishing the law of the case)).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Barbara PRESTON v. HITCHIN RAIL, INC., and RAM Mutual Insurance Company, Relators, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Blue-Cross BlueShield, Medica, Downtown Orthopedics, Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry/VRU, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Northern Orthopedics, St. Cloud Orthopedics, Bertha Medical Clinic, Interveners
- Status
- Published