Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations

Minnesota Supreme Court
Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations, 828 N.W.2d 732 (Minn. 2013)
2013 WL 1487917; 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188
Dietzen

Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 12, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prec-edential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/-

Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name
Raul Ruiz ARROYO v. LIFE SCIENCE INNOVATIONS and SFM Risk Solutions, Inc., Relators
Status
Published