Minnesota Supreme Court, 2013

Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations

Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 2, 2013 · Dietzen
828 N.W.2d 732; 2013 WL 1487917; 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 12, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prec-edential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/-

Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.