In re Disciplinary Action Against Sannes

Minnesota Supreme Court
In re Disciplinary Action Against Sannes, 832 N.W.2d 446 (Minn. 2013)
2013 WL 3415284; 2013 Minn. LEXIS 343
Alan

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

In re Disciplinary Action Against Sannes

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Jon K. Sannes committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, after learning that his client made a false statement to a tribunal, failing to inform opposing counsel or the opposing party and failing to correct the false statement, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.3(a)(1) and 8.4(c) and (d).

Respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition for disciplinary action. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 30-day suspension.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings therein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent Jon K. Sannes is suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days after the date of the filing of this order, for a minimum of 30 days;

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals);

3. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR;

4. Within one year of the date of the filing of this order, respondent shall file with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director proof of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to timely file the required documentation shall result in automatic re-suspension, as provided in Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR; and

5. Respondent shall be eligible for reinstatement to the practice of law following the expiration of the suspension period provided that, not less than 15 days before the end of the suspension period, respondent files with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serves upon the Director an affidavit establishing that he is current in continuing legal education requirements, has complied with Rules 24 and 26, RLPR, and has complied with any other conditions for reinstatement imposed by the court. BY THE COURT:

/s/_ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name
In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jon K. SANNES, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 204316
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published