Mironenko v. Grounded Air, Inc.

Item: Mironenko v. Grounded Air, Inc.
Author: hallapproved.com

Minnesota Supreme Court October 1, 2013

Mironenko v. Grounded Air, Inc., 837 N.W.2d 458 (Minn. 2013)

2013 WL 5592946; 2013 Minn. LEXIS 409

Anderson

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on De*459cember 3, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/_ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Ivan MIRONENKO, Employee v. GROUNDED AIR, INC., Uninsured, and David Herzog, Individually, Uninsured, Relators, and Life Medical, P.A., Intervener, and Special Compensation Fund
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published