Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community

Minnesota Supreme Court
Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community, 843 N.W.2d 785 (Minn. 2014)
2014 WL 976876; 2014 Minn. LEXIS 101
Alan, Consideration, Lillehaug, Took

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals was filed on April 26, 2013, and on December 26, 2013, we issued a decision in Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 2013), that addressed whether the work-connection test is an appropriate test for determining whether an injury is com-pensable.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) filed April 1, 2013, be, and the same is, vacated and the matter is remanded to the WCCA for further proceedings consistent with Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 2013).

LILLEHAUG, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

BY THE COURT

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name
Carol J. KAINZ v. ARROWHEAD SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY, Self-Insured, administered by Berkley Risk Administrators Co., Relator, and Iron Range Rehab Center, Orthopaedic Associates of Duluth, P.A., Intervenors
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published