Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2015, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Arrowhead Senior Living Community v. Kainz (Minn. 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals was filed on April 26, 2013, and on December 26, 2013, we issued a decision in Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 2013), that addressed whether the work-connection test is an appropriate test for determining whether an injury is com-pensable.
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) filed April 1, 2013, be, and the same is, vacated and the matter is remanded to the WCCA for further proceedings consistent with Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 2013).
BY THE COURT
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.